My interpretation of the slide is there were no SAE's attributed to LL because it says "SAE related to LL n=0". The n=1 SAE that was related to "treatment" doesn't mean it was caused by LL because I believe LL was used in combination with other drug(s).

Quote:

---

I mean if this is the only SAE we have fine but I’m just wondering if this is even technically a SAE.

---