(Total Views: 224)
Posted On: 12/09/2022 10:30:18 PM
Post# of 13035
Unfortunately, making people guess seems to be the objective with a majority of the company's tweets for many years now. At the same time, well over a majority of the company's tweets have not materialized to any degree as first presented.
Just a few takeaways after reading the tweet posted somewhere else. Going to show why tweeting vague and cryptic messages can backfire on companies.
1. Most noticable, is the person tweeting must be the "CEO" of Sun Pacific Power (no mention of Snpw).
2. The person (assumed to be the CEO) tweeting must have felt a dire need to tweet something that was, either, said or written, to him (hopefully verbatim), by a specific person (left out), affiliated with a specific entity (left out), claiming to have formed a "partnership" with the CEO (or Sun Pacific Power).
3. The "entity" (supposedly a state?) seems to be claiming some "partnership" (see definition below) with the "CEO" (or Sun Pacific Power) formed through "communications" with the CEO. No mention of Sun Pacific Power's "team" or "representatives" (because you'll never see a Co. tweet with anyone else's name).
Partnership: A partnership is a form of business where two or more people share ownership, as well as the responsibility for managing the company and the income or losses the business generates
4. How is a "partnership" formed only through communications unless something has been agreed to "where two or more people share ownership". No 8-K filing relating to any partnership with a state/governmental entity. No mention of meeting the CEO? Just communications.
5. In my opinion, I read this as someone being in the very early stages with trying to pitch lender(s), in the hopes of financing debt, and needing letters of reference from various players. It just happens to also be a convenient way to be able mention oneself (as in me-me-me), by name, a couple of times in a tweet and pat oneself's own back.
in my humble opinion
cheers
Just a few takeaways after reading the tweet posted somewhere else. Going to show why tweeting vague and cryptic messages can backfire on companies.
Quote:
Dec 9, 2022
Received state support $snpw
"We have been in communications with Sun Pacific Power CEO, Mr. Nicholas Campanella and value the partnership that we have developed. We are thrilled with the prospect of a new green energy business and pledge to work closely with Mr. Campanella."
1. Most noticable, is the person tweeting must be the "CEO" of Sun Pacific Power (no mention of Snpw).
2. The person (assumed to be the CEO) tweeting must have felt a dire need to tweet something that was, either, said or written, to him (hopefully verbatim), by a specific person (left out), affiliated with a specific entity (left out), claiming to have formed a "partnership" with the CEO (or Sun Pacific Power).
3. The "entity" (supposedly a state?) seems to be claiming some "partnership" (see definition below) with the "CEO" (or Sun Pacific Power) formed through "communications" with the CEO. No mention of Sun Pacific Power's "team" or "representatives" (because you'll never see a Co. tweet with anyone else's name).
Partnership: A partnership is a form of business where two or more people share ownership, as well as the responsibility for managing the company and the income or losses the business generates
4. How is a "partnership" formed only through communications unless something has been agreed to "where two or more people share ownership". No 8-K filing relating to any partnership with a state/governmental entity. No mention of meeting the CEO? Just communications.
5. In my opinion, I read this as someone being in the very early stages with trying to pitch lender(s), in the hopes of financing debt, and needing letters of reference from various players. It just happens to also be a convenient way to be able mention oneself (as in me-me-me), by name, a couple of times in a tweet and pat oneself's own back.
in my humble opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
