(Total Views: 464)
Posted On: 12/05/2022 9:40:08 PM
Post# of 148870
I have a question and I'm sure it has been discussed, so I apologize for asking it again, but I forgot the answer.
What is necessary for Sidley Austin to prove in order to collect damages beyond what CytoDyn has paid to Amarex? CytoDyn paid about $80 million to Amarex. If we want to sue for more than that, what does Sidley Austin need to show about Leronlimab?
That it was safe only? or that it was safe and effective?
Won't the peer reviewed document that is coming out show that leronlimab was effective?
How did the FDA allow CytoDyn to perform all the trials in mTNBC, HIV, Covid, long haulers and NASH in Phase 2 if it were not safe? Why did they let it go on for so long? Were we just waiting for just somebody to get sick like what happened in Brazil?
Also, what did submitting that Investigational Brochure actually do for CytoDyn other than just fulfill another one of the documents the FDA required?
What is necessary for Sidley Austin to prove in order to collect damages beyond what CytoDyn has paid to Amarex? CytoDyn paid about $80 million to Amarex. If we want to sue for more than that, what does Sidley Austin need to show about Leronlimab?
That it was safe only? or that it was safe and effective?
Won't the peer reviewed document that is coming out show that leronlimab was effective?
How did the FDA allow CytoDyn to perform all the trials in mTNBC, HIV, Covid, long haulers and NASH in Phase 2 if it were not safe? Why did they let it go on for so long? Were we just waiting for just somebody to get sick like what happened in Brazil?
Also, what did submitting that Investigational Brochure actually do for CytoDyn other than just fulfill another one of the documents the FDA required?
(0)
(2)Scroll down for more posts ▼
