Craig, please read my entire posts if you’re going to comment on them, or if you are deliberately cherry-picking, please know that you’re going to get called on it.

I specifically mentioned gross negligence, as evidenced by their failure to follow the FDA’s explicit and detailed instructions. I specifically mentioned the 3 auditors who say the data is unusable.

That is not merely a failure to perform at a professional standard, as specified in the contract.

It is easily construed by a reasonable person as gross negligence.
An attorney should be familiar with the “reasonable person” phraseology.

You can certainly make snotty claims about my supposedly “not being right” based on your cherry-picking one phrase I used in the context of a very long post, but if you will put your reading-comprehension glasses on, perhaps you might bother to read the rest of my post and realize what we all know — that your just claiming you are right when the facts are against you do NOT make you correct.

The EVIDENCE is that Amarex was grossly negligent. And I included such evidence in my post.

In your practice, bullying and pretending not to understand may be tactics that help you negotiate contracts. Ignoring facts HERE merely makes you look silly.