(Total Views: 509)
Posted On: 11/01/2022 3:36:44 PM
Post# of 6857
Re: reindeer830 #4243
They are just desperate and because I have put out some facts about Doc all they have is attack the poster which speaks for itself, just like when I posted Doc had never had UNVC on the NASDAQ its all in the filings.
My associate is in Ohio now unless he left today, we have the document ready to send Dalton but decided to wait till after the filings/Thanksgiving (because several friends wanted us to they're hoping they'll have something in it.)
It's just like HRI Doc used it to pump UNVC if its making all that money why is he having trouble in his personal life money wise. Its all speculation if it will be brought in UNVC because he has lied to shareholders so much why would I believe he will if he says anything now the only way I believe it is with proof.
If I still didn't have a substantial amount of shares I would be gone only to look back at the boards every once in a while.
If Univec goes under he'll blame shareholders for not giving him time to make it all work, UNVC is in distress now bad I look for a R/S in a attempt to save it. We'll soon know if I'm thinking wrong.
My associate is in Ohio now unless he left today, we have the document ready to send Dalton but decided to wait till after the filings/Thanksgiving (because several friends wanted us to they're hoping they'll have something in it.)
It's just like HRI Doc used it to pump UNVC if its making all that money why is he having trouble in his personal life money wise. Its all speculation if it will be brought in UNVC because he has lied to shareholders so much why would I believe he will if he says anything now the only way I believe it is with proof.
If I still didn't have a substantial amount of shares I would be gone only to look back at the boards every once in a while.
If Univec goes under he'll blame shareholders for not giving him time to make it all work, UNVC is in distress now bad I look for a R/S in a attempt to save it. We'll soon know if I'm thinking wrong.
(5)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
