and that's why I keep harping back on all the Auditing that has been done over the past 3-6 months. And now with the recent External FDA Type GCP Auditing Authority, I keep thinking, what did they uncover?

OK, so we have completed our work towards getting the hold lifted. Right? That is what they said. They have done all they can do. In addition, CytoDyn has gotten the Warning Banner Removed. But, that was not primary purpose of the External Auditor.

I wrote this nearly a month ago here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LeronLimab_Times/com...;context=3

Quote:

---

It was nice to see the Warning Banner just disappear. It just happened. One day, it was just not there. The same will be true when the hold is lifted. But it will be more publicized. Because, following this piece of information, a boat load of veiled information will be unveiled . And I think that the Enforcer will hasten the process of getting the hold lifted. However, the primary purpose of the Enforcer is not to get the hold lifted. Rather, the primary output of this FDA GCP Type Audit is to produce that piece of information that helps CytoDyn make the decision of whether or not to re-prepare the BLA for HIV. The 2nd purpose of the Audit is to determine whether the original BLA for HIV, (had it been prepared in accordance with pre-defined FDA BLA preparation requirements), would have already been first accepted and then subsequently approved by the FDA today. Neither of these 2 purposes is directed towards the FDA. The 1st purpose is to answer an internal question that will direct CytoDyn's direction based on the findings of the Audit. The 2nd purpose is not to get the FDA to lift the hold. Rather, it serves as powerful proof of a great injustice purposed and committed against CytoDyn that may serve as a "Bargaining Chip" by any who possess it and strategically wield it in their hands . /quote]

I've recently discussed that the levee is about to break. The water is about to break, but, whatever it is, come Monday morning, it may be disclosed or it may not, but, either way, the dam is about to break and I'm thinking Monday am, something may. Why else call such an early meeting? Now, If we don't actually hear specifically on Monday about this evidence uncovered through the auditors, then it may be hinted at, but, I feel enough should be revealed about it, that it should be significant enough at least to have the shorts pull their 9 million short share bet off the table, if not lead to a more heated attempt to cover.

---