(Total Views: 349)
Posted On: 08/25/2022 2:06:06 PM
Post# of 6857
Dalton is a liar at best, a scammer at worst.
Having spent a significant amount of time over the last 4 years researching Dalton and his companies, it's safe to say he has consistently lied to investors - were his lies malicious and for personal gain? Or did he lie simply because he failed in his aims?
It remains to be seen, but along with the lies are a number of very concerning issues: his personal lawsuits, the operational status of his private companies, dubious and unverifiable awards, 20 years of financial losses in Univec, loans from toxic lenders, unusual relationships with certain investors, suspect shares issuances and questionable share information, non-adherence to reporting guidelines etc etc etc.
Yes, businesses can take a while to get up and running, but over a decade? What has Doc actually been doing for all these years to warrant over $13.5 million in deferred payroll liabilities??
As of this moment in time, and despite his ever positive cryptic statements via various private messages and public media posts on LinkedIn and Twitter, absolutely nothing has been delivered. Zero. His long promised associations and affiliations, partnership agreements and acquisitions have all come to nothing: Univec's revenues continue to be pathetic, and the losses and ridiculous unwarranted payroll liabilities continue to mount.
Would Doc have even gone current if the new SEC regulations had not come into effect? If his intention was to uplist, why didn’t he re-register with the SEC to become fully reporting? Why weren't the financials audited when he applied for Pink Current?
I believe Doc has gone silent because he has run out of things to say, and has nothing to tell us anyway. Ultimately, UNVC may well be pink current - but we are still completely in the dark.
For me only one question remains, is he a scammer too?
Having spent a significant amount of time over the last 4 years researching Dalton and his companies, it's safe to say he has consistently lied to investors - were his lies malicious and for personal gain? Or did he lie simply because he failed in his aims?
It remains to be seen, but along with the lies are a number of very concerning issues: his personal lawsuits, the operational status of his private companies, dubious and unverifiable awards, 20 years of financial losses in Univec, loans from toxic lenders, unusual relationships with certain investors, suspect shares issuances and questionable share information, non-adherence to reporting guidelines etc etc etc.
Yes, businesses can take a while to get up and running, but over a decade? What has Doc actually been doing for all these years to warrant over $13.5 million in deferred payroll liabilities??
As of this moment in time, and despite his ever positive cryptic statements via various private messages and public media posts on LinkedIn and Twitter, absolutely nothing has been delivered. Zero. His long promised associations and affiliations, partnership agreements and acquisitions have all come to nothing: Univec's revenues continue to be pathetic, and the losses and ridiculous unwarranted payroll liabilities continue to mount.
Would Doc have even gone current if the new SEC regulations had not come into effect? If his intention was to uplist, why didn’t he re-register with the SEC to become fully reporting? Why weren't the financials audited when he applied for Pink Current?
I believe Doc has gone silent because he has run out of things to say, and has nothing to tell us anyway. Ultimately, UNVC may well be pink current - but we are still completely in the dark.
For me only one question remains, is he a scammer too?
(12)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
