(Total Views: 315)
Posted On: 08/22/2022 2:10:27 PM
Post# of 6857
I'm saying this level of reporting favors Dalton
Particularly a complete lack thereof.
There are so many discrepancies and unknowns out there due directly to the fact that Dalton is not adhering to reporting guidelines - changes of control and disposal of common shares, financial obligations, eradication of debt notes, status of acquisitions and termination of agreements, changes to directors and principal officers, insider transactions etc etc.
What I do know is UNVC has not made a profit in any single reporting year since Dalton took the helm.
2001 - $893k loss
2002 - $505k loss
2003 - $1.65m loss
2004 - $4.02m loss
2005 - $1.88m loss
2006 - $1.18m loss
Dark Period
2018 - $978k loss on $14k of revenues
2019 - $1.11m loss on $14k of revenues
2020 - $1.17m loss on $14k of revenues
2021 - $1.34m loss on $53k of revenues
If I had figures like this I'd probably try to minimize my reporting too.
Particularly a complete lack thereof.
There are so many discrepancies and unknowns out there due directly to the fact that Dalton is not adhering to reporting guidelines - changes of control and disposal of common shares, financial obligations, eradication of debt notes, status of acquisitions and termination of agreements, changes to directors and principal officers, insider transactions etc etc.
What I do know is UNVC has not made a profit in any single reporting year since Dalton took the helm.
2001 - $893k loss
2002 - $505k loss
2003 - $1.65m loss
2004 - $4.02m loss
2005 - $1.88m loss
2006 - $1.18m loss
Dark Period
2018 - $978k loss on $14k of revenues
2019 - $1.11m loss on $14k of revenues
2020 - $1.17m loss on $14k of revenues
2021 - $1.34m loss on $53k of revenues
If I had figures like this I'd probably try to minimize my reporting too.
(4)
(0)
