(Total Views: 289)
Posted On: 08/19/2022 12:20:18 PM
Post# of 6857
Just bear in mind Doc has no issue ignoring regulations.
There are so many instances where UNVC should have filed to report material events but chose not to do so, as such I would even question his reporting of share counts - especially if they would reveal his personal selling of securities and prove he has been deceptive to his investors and shareholders.
If he did re-register UNVC with the SEC the reporting duties, public disclosure, regulatory oversight, and penalties are significantly higher - as are the possibilities of being caught in a lie.
Why would he file a Form 144 if he had no intention of selling?
Why would he not re-register with the SEC if his intention is to operate a legitimate company and subsequently uplist?
Why issue PR's announcing multiple new management positions but neglect to include them in obligatory filings?
Why would he continually lead investors on with statements lauding great progress but then omit to provide any tangible proof?
Why does he continually enter arbitrary 'quiet periods' when there is nothing legally stopping him from informing investors?
Because it's all a charade, and a carefully orchestrated one at that.
There are so many instances where UNVC should have filed to report material events but chose not to do so, as such I would even question his reporting of share counts - especially if they would reveal his personal selling of securities and prove he has been deceptive to his investors and shareholders.
If he did re-register UNVC with the SEC the reporting duties, public disclosure, regulatory oversight, and penalties are significantly higher - as are the possibilities of being caught in a lie.
Why would he file a Form 144 if he had no intention of selling?
Why would he not re-register with the SEC if his intention is to operate a legitimate company and subsequently uplist?
Why issue PR's announcing multiple new management positions but neglect to include them in obligatory filings?
Why would he continually lead investors on with statements lauding great progress but then omit to provide any tangible proof?
Why does he continually enter arbitrary 'quiet periods' when there is nothing legally stopping him from informing investors?
Because it's all a charade, and a carefully orchestrated one at that.
(5)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
