(Total Views: 786)
Posted On: 08/08/2022 12:39:21 PM
Post# of 145874
I agree with you, sean007, however you cannot have it both ways.
There are many on this board who routinely ignore history and fundamentals with this stock and are absolutely trading 90% on sentiment (a view of or attitude toward a situation or event; an opinion), whether it be fear or something else.
While I have personally bought more recently at .68, .79, and $1.09, it is more based on sentiment than history and certainly not the fundamentals.
Do I believe in the molecule? YES, I do, however history has shown more anecdotally than anything else, really, as the other numbers have not reached the threshold of giving Vyrologix letigimacy...yet. I believe we will get there, which is why I buy more, but that is sentiment.
There are many on this board who routinely ignore history and fundamentals with this stock and are absolutely trading 90% on sentiment (a view of or attitude toward a situation or event; an opinion), whether it be fear or something else.
While I have personally bought more recently at .68, .79, and $1.09, it is more based on sentiment than history and certainly not the fundamentals.
Do I believe in the molecule? YES, I do, however history has shown more anecdotally than anything else, really, as the other numbers have not reached the threshold of giving Vyrologix letigimacy...yet. I believe we will get there, which is why I buy more, but that is sentiment.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)