(Total Views: 185)
Posted On: 07/11/2022 9:23:48 PM
Post# of 13818
LMAO?? What's so funny about this? Pls use readers
Tweet & Reply Tweet
https://twitter.com/SunPacificPower/status/15...0200651776
Red text is clearly a written communication (with confirmation reply) on the company's official twitter page claiming " we " meaning the company are " BEGINNING " lithium battery production.
That tweet is either true or false, If true, would it require an 8-K prior (timeframe) to a written public promotion in the form of a tweet?
https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersform8k
Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant
Item 2.04 Triggering Events That Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
Can you imagine tweeting that we (company) are beginning lithium extraction (or lithium battery production) on the largest social media communications platform on the planet?
I know, you know, exactly, what the issue is here. I also know, for some reason (close to home), you're defending it while thinking it's funny.
Done with this topic. Moving on.
Need to look at your thoughts in a previous post about IST Indonesian-made (while under a DPA) solar panels made to look like made in the USA by rebranding them by slapping SPP logo on them. .
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=6436073
Tweet & Reply Tweet
https://twitter.com/SunPacificPower/status/15...0200651776
Quote:
Sun Pacific Holding Corp
@SunPacificPower
Jul 10
Replying to
@SunPacificPower
For the non believer/ complainer we are BEGINNING
Questions or comments contact us directly and we will provide clarity on all public information including grammatical errors! Anyone have information on the individual, we can help them understand better ? $SNPW is Golden
Red text is clearly a written communication (with confirmation reply) on the company's official twitter page claiming " we " meaning the company are " BEGINNING " lithium battery production.
That tweet is either true or false, If true, would it require an 8-K prior (timeframe) to a written public promotion in the form of a tweet?
https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersform8k
Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant
Item 2.04 Triggering Events That Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
Can you imagine tweeting that we (company) are beginning lithium extraction (or lithium battery production) on the largest social media communications platform on the planet?
I know, you know, exactly, what the issue is here. I also know, for some reason (close to home), you're defending it while thinking it's funny.
Done with this topic. Moving on.
Need to look at your thoughts in a previous post about IST Indonesian-made (while under a DPA) solar panels made to look like made in the USA by rebranding them by slapping SPP logo on them. .
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=6436073
Quote:
If was making a guess
IST will be making solar panels in the US licensing SNPW name and
rebranding them as made in the US products .
FoxEss will be making batteriesQuote:and
in the US licensing SNPW name
Quote:
rebranding then as made in the US products.
Ummm, I know you know what the problem is with that. Not good!
imho
cheers
(0)
(0)
