(Total Views: 172)
Posted On: 06/26/2022 5:45:18 PM
Post# of 13512
lmao!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=169247297
Ummm, maybe because it was a "Letter of Intent to Approve" contingent upon a few things that medi-ri did not satisfy
A party that has signed a letter of intent (LOI) may be legally bound to honor it depending on how the letter is drafted. In a business-to-business transaction, a letter of intent normally contains a provision stating that the letter is non-binding. Even if such language is not included, it is possible a court would rule that the letter is only an expression of intent. On the other hand, the parties to a letter of intent should not rely on assumptions : Strong non-binding language is recommended.
Get over it please!
Move on the Blissful Holdings, AspireMe and Reeau's of the world. Weren't those were all written agreements? Where are those projects at? That's who you should be bitching at since it's never snpw's fault. What a joke.
imho
cheers
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=169247297
Quote:
Agree, otherwise why would they provided a Letter Of Intent To Approve.
Ummm, maybe because it was a "Letter of Intent to Approve" contingent upon a few things that medi-ri did not satisfy
A party that has signed a letter of intent (LOI) may be legally bound to honor it depending on how the letter is drafted. In a business-to-business transaction, a letter of intent normally contains a provision stating that the letter is non-binding. Even if such language is not included, it is possible a court would rule that the letter is only an expression of intent. On the other hand, the parties to a letter of intent should not rely on assumptions : Strong non-binding language is recommended.
Get over it please!
Move on the Blissful Holdings, AspireMe and Reeau's of the world. Weren't those were all written agreements? Where are those projects at? That's who you should be bitching at since it's never snpw's fault. What a joke.
imho
cheers
(0)
(0)
