(Total Views: 447)
Posted On: 06/10/2022 8:22:05 AM
Post# of 148903
Nice explanation.
I wonder if the following has a fairly mundane cause…
“ Even by the time his baseline is 825 ms, the benefit he derives, becomes more akin to a reduced rate of actual scarring, rather than a positive increase in the amount of scar tissue removed.”
Could it be the age of the scar tissue? Older more entrenched tissues could be more difficult to reverse, while the newer ‘deposits’, those in the greater than baseline 1000 for instance. Could it be the low-hanging fruit (younger scar tissue) is easier to pick than the stuff way up in the tree (older more entrenched scar tissue)?
Just a thought from a layman.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=641...z7VoISV4mU
I wonder if the following has a fairly mundane cause…
“ Even by the time his baseline is 825 ms, the benefit he derives, becomes more akin to a reduced rate of actual scarring, rather than a positive increase in the amount of scar tissue removed.”
Could it be the age of the scar tissue? Older more entrenched tissues could be more difficult to reverse, while the newer ‘deposits’, those in the greater than baseline 1000 for instance. Could it be the low-hanging fruit (younger scar tissue) is easier to pick than the stuff way up in the tree (older more entrenched scar tissue)?
Just a thought from a layman.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=641...z7VoISV4mU
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
