Quote:

---

SA did not do this for attorney fees.

---

MGK, don't be making me agree with Craig, which I just did.
Of course SA did this for attorney's fees. Why else do you think they took the case, but for attorney's fees.
I doubt any attorney would take this case as public interest pro bono, even though some of us might think they should.
Sidley Austin did this for attorney's fees.
Maybe the attorney's fees is money, maybe it is stock, maybe it is a percentage of a damage claim, but nonetheless in any case it is attorney's fees that they seek.