(Total Views: 748)
Posted On: 05/25/2022 7:19:46 AM
Post# of 154229
Yes Craig, I am saying Remdesivir was not going to by replaced by another therapeutic no matter what. No matter what!
Step back for a second Craig, the FDA and Big Pharma just burnt 800,000 people here with a therapeutic they knew didn't work. Do you think they would have let a small company stop the Pfizer vaccine rollout? Nothing was going to stop it. Novavax still doesn't have FDA approval.
Look at the big picture, not our little petty company trying to run trials. Our only chance was maybe right at the beginning of the Pandemic, but there are always ways to stop even competent companies.
So just what stopped Canada from giving us an EUA, or India from injecting people, or PI, or Mexico, or our slow walked Brazil trial or our LH success?
You keep on and on beating the same dead horse. Negative, negative, negetive. Even now you are still doing it, why? To prove you're right, to soft bash? Nader's gone, Covid's gone. You got 13D back. And you still go on and on beating the same drum. Why? Just what do you want?
Step back for a second Craig, the FDA and Big Pharma just burnt 800,000 people here with a therapeutic they knew didn't work. Do you think they would have let a small company stop the Pfizer vaccine rollout? Nothing was going to stop it. Novavax still doesn't have FDA approval.
Look at the big picture, not our little petty company trying to run trials. Our only chance was maybe right at the beginning of the Pandemic, but there are always ways to stop even competent companies.
So just what stopped Canada from giving us an EUA, or India from injecting people, or PI, or Mexico, or our slow walked Brazil trial or our LH success?
You keep on and on beating the same dead horse. Negative, negative, negetive. Even now you are still doing it, why? To prove you're right, to soft bash? Nader's gone, Covid's gone. You got 13D back. And you still go on and on beating the same drum. Why? Just what do you want?
(10)
(0)
