The concern became evident to me in the process of promoting Blocksafe Technologies and IDentityUSA. In both instances there was no evidence that sales took place to benefit StrikeForce Technologies in either instance, despite such as with IDentityUSA I know for a fact sales took place as I made a few myself. I became concerned that something did not make sense. While promoting Blocksafe Technologies I did tweet CNBC about 20 times indicating the STO of the BSAFE token was imminent. In hindsight I can imagine the management team did not want CNBC to focus on its token offering. I still fail to understand why some money was not spent to make sales happen, then advertise the modest success and build on it. It is almost as if the appearance of the effort was more important. I know only a little Gimli, Lord knows I don’t have the answers.