(Total Views: 90)
Posted On: 04/25/2022 10:12:44 AM
Post# of 13828
Re: Wallstreet1234 #1201
The cancellation of the 14C OCCURRED in 2021 did it not, which would be an event within the within the time period of the current 10K., January 1 2021 to December 31,th 2021.
So not really OLD news now is it?
Unlike events that occurred in 2019.
Why fail to mention an investor paying double the trading price at the time January 29. 2021[b] when the cancelled 14c was still in effect?[/b]
Why fail to mention investor by 250,000 shares at a 25 to 50% discount February 8 2021 when the cancelled 14c was still in effect?
That 14 C did't phase them.
While fail to mention one was exercising a warrant?
Why fail to mention one was REMOVING CONVERTIBLE DEBT off the books?
and
Why fail to mention NOT ONE SINGLE SHARE OF STOCK WAS SOLD AFTER MARCH 11. 2021?
So what exactly is "your narrative" that leaves out and tries to hide current important and relevant information ?
Quote:
The cancellation of the previous 14c (old news) is currently being used as data suggesting the current 14c will be cancelled. But old news that doesn’t fit your narrative can’t be used. Got it.
So not really OLD news now is it?
Unlike events that occurred in 2019.
Why fail to mention an investor paying double the trading price at the time January 29. 2021[b] when the cancelled 14c was still in effect?[/b]
Why fail to mention investor by 250,000 shares at a 25 to 50% discount February 8 2021 when the cancelled 14c was still in effect?
That 14 C did't phase them.
While fail to mention one was exercising a warrant?
Quote:
AND most important and relevant
Why fail to mention one was REMOVING CONVERTIBLE DEBT off the books?
and
Why fail to mention NOT ONE SINGLE SHARE OF STOCK WAS SOLD AFTER MARCH 11. 2021?
So what exactly is "your narrative" that leaves out and tries to hide current important and relevant information ?
(0)
(0)
