(Total Views: 250)
Posted On: 04/23/2022 3:30:39 PM
Post# of 3400
Re: SVENoftheNORTH #1991
A follow-on to my previous post... when I used the term "mislabeled", I'm not suggesting any intentional wrong-doing nor misdirection.
For the "Pearlman theory" to hold you would need the preferred shareholder issue to be incorrectly described in the notification. The odds of that are low - given the scrutiny of documents. So in the end, my theory is likely as I described before... just a side-show to the main event.
JMO - do your DD.
For the "Pearlman theory" to hold you would need the preferred shareholder issue to be incorrectly described in the notification. The odds of that are low - given the scrutiny of documents. So in the end, my theory is likely as I described before... just a side-show to the main event.
JMO - do your DD.
(1)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼