(Total Views: 510)
Posted On: 04/07/2022 3:32:18 PM
Post# of 154185
OK, speaking of horses, have you heard the one about a horse walks into a bar and the bartended, being the caring person she was asks, "why the long face?"
I agree that NASH is still in the game. The question I have is, why no response on top line results? Well, IMO there are only two reasons to explain this: (1) the results are not as good as we had hoped. (2) The results were great and an NDA is keeping the results under wraps.
Can't really muster up any other reasons, but I like number 2. Secondly, would poor results on 700mg need to be disclosed?
Anyone think of any other reasons for the silence on NASH?
I like the cancer indications. We know LL works on cancer. Now we need to prove it.
I agree that NASH is still in the game. The question I have is, why no response on top line results? Well, IMO there are only two reasons to explain this: (1) the results are not as good as we had hoped. (2) The results were great and an NDA is keeping the results under wraps.
Can't really muster up any other reasons, but I like number 2. Secondly, would poor results on 700mg need to be disclosed?
Anyone think of any other reasons for the silence on NASH?
I like the cancer indications. We know LL works on cancer. Now we need to prove it.
(3)
(0)
