(Total Views: 437)
Posted On: 03/18/2022 10:23:58 AM
Post# of 152017
Re: craigakess #120251
It’s not. I shared the Lee story because the board was slow.
I find the case interesting because of the precedent setting victory that Sidley Austin achieved on our behalf, and that it is now beneficial to others. Gotta give them (and perhaps our BOD that hired them) credit.
I also find the condition of approving the bylaws “on a clear day” interesting. This shows forethought by our BOD, and frankly, the bylaw requirements should have been easily identified by 13D if the were at all competent, or at least less arrogant.
But as others state, old news. And clearly, we have much more important things to chat about today, like levers, and holes.
I find the case interesting because of the precedent setting victory that Sidley Austin achieved on our behalf, and that it is now beneficial to others. Gotta give them (and perhaps our BOD that hired them) credit.
I also find the condition of approving the bylaws “on a clear day” interesting. This shows forethought by our BOD, and frankly, the bylaw requirements should have been easily identified by 13D if the were at all competent, or at least less arrogant.
But as others state, old news. And clearly, we have much more important things to chat about today, like levers, and holes.
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
