(Total Views: 580)
Posted On: 03/18/2022 2:31:37 AM
Post# of 148908
A little added color. Most likely being a stockholder of record was in the bylaws (it is)
Quote:
Noncompliance with two bylaw requirements formed the grounds for Lee's rejection. First, the notice was not submitted by a stockholder of record. The plaintiff had attempted to become a record holder three business days before Lee's nomination deadline but the transfer was not completed in time. The plaintiff had also asked Cede & Co.—the record holder for its shares—to provide what amounted to a cover letter for its nomination in an alternative attempt to meet the requirement. Second, the plaintiff did not use Lee's nominee questionnaire forms, which were made available to record holders.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=...p;as_vis=1
Quote:
by any stockholder of the Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 2 and who is a stockholder of record at the time such notice is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation (the "Secretary" , on the record date for the determination of stockholders of the Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting, and at the time of the meeting.[
(2)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼