For the record, Rathke admitted to making errors in his criticism, including inverting the sign of the classical wave equation 9, which undermined much of his arguments. Mills responded to correct Rathke, but Rathke never acknowledged or engaged him. It was a pure false hit job. And the fascist academic gatekeepers at the journal wouldn't even publish Mills' response.

There is nothing fake, and no fake data are involved. Not sure where you are getting that from. Mills showed without a doubt via many publications and experiments that hydrinos are real, and have properties as he predicted. I understand how everyone is a critic though, except of their own strongly held beliefs.

Best of luck to all the science minded truth seekers out there.