(Total Views: 551)
Posted On: 02/09/2022 10:26:33 AM
Post# of 148899
that is why i think NP was removed because further negotiations could not proceed due to NP not wanting to accept the potential deal or direction the partnership. The board had to remove him to proceed. Maybe financing was contingent on the financier having people on the board to monitor their investment and Nader was against this possibly.
It could also be that a number of large investors really put pressure on the board to act in the best interest of the shareholders and fire Nader for not delivering on goals for 2021.
It could also be that a number of large investors really put pressure on the board to act in the best interest of the shareholders and fire Nader for not delivering on goals for 2021.
(0)
(1)
Scroll down for more posts ▼