That’s the beauty of this board, we are all entitled to share our opinion and I respect that and have no problem with you disagreeing. The next week or two should answer it and show what was intended by it.

The point is… some things do not have to be read into… they are literally what they are stated as… and that’s OK!

So many try to make something out of nothing constantly that it over-hypes something that was never really there… and those people lose credibility and IMO it ultimately hurts the stock. There is a difference between due diligence based on real communication or information, vs a gut feeling or “what if” guesses.

I’m just electing to take the communication from a formal corporate representative that seems to be stating something refreshingly direct.

I could go through a very long list of “imminent releases”, “quiet periods”, “about to launch”, “distribution about to roll out”,”partnership about to be announced” and “uplist coming” claims of “due diligence”over the last three years that absolutely never materialized that I’m appreciative of actual clear statements from a UNVC representative even if I wish it was more. I’m still here, holding shares and hoping for the best… I can handle that there may not be anything else to share for now. I’d rather that than listening to a bunch of pumpers trying to run it up next week to unload again.