That statement was based on a 316 patient trial with a 126 patient interim. No argument from me that we have a very good chance of hitting stat sig at 126. There is a much smaller chance we hit it at 51 patients. If we do hit stat sig at 51 the DMSC should take into account the confidence interval but they won't take into account the near zero chance of getting an EUA. So is the company going to chance it and shut down the trial and attempt to get an EUA or go on to 126. If they're wise enough to go on to 126 then they shouldn't have changed the protocol at all.