(Total Views: 515)
Posted On: 11/03/2021 10:47:57 AM
Post# of 154725
Quote:
Actually it's 75% of those who had reduced or low levels of CTCs that make up that 3600% number.
I think you are saying the same thing said here in the post to which you replied:
Quote:
.. 21 (75%) had reduced CTCs .. Of those 21, they had improved overall survival, from the typical say 1-2 months, up to much higher (personally, I think the 3600% is probably a Nadderism; i.e. confused number).
Hopefully we'll see the raw numbers at some point, like we did before.
It would be interesting if there were some way to predict ahead of time who those 18/28 responders would be, or who/why the 7/28 don't respond with lower CTCs. (Could probably skip giving LL to those with low CTC numbers to start? the 3/28 from PR).
Exciting to be applying for BTD this week. Numbers seem to support it. No side effects. What a drug!
(5)
(0)
