(Total Views: 616)
Posted On: 10/14/2021 4:17:06 PM
Post# of 156745
If anyone is interested to see what we are up against.
FDA to Hold Advisory Committee Meeting to Discuss Merck and Ridgeback’s EUA Application for COVID-19 Oral Treatment
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is announcing an upcoming meeting of its Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC) to discuss Merck and Ridgeback’s request for an emergency use authorization (EUA) for molnupiravir, an investigational antiviral drug to treat COVID-19.
On Nov. 30, the advisory committee will meet to discuss the available data supporting the use of molnupiravir to treat mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults who have tested positive for COVID-19, and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death.
"The FDA is evaluating the safety and effectiveness data submitted by Merck and Ridgeback in their emergency use authorization request for molnupiravir, a new oral treatment for high-risk individuals with a newly diagnosed COVID-19 infection. We believe that, in this instance, a public discussion of these data with the agency’s advisory committee will help ensure clear understanding of the scientific data and information that the FDA is evaluating to make a decision about whether to authorize this treatment for emergency use,” said Patrizia Cavazzoni, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
At the FDA’s discretion, the agency may convene an advisory committee to solicit advice from independent outside experts on various complex scientific, technical, and policy issues. The FDA does not always convene an advisory committee meeting in connection with EUA reviews, but may do so under certain circumstances when discussion with the advisory committee will help inform agency decision making.
The meeting was scheduled as soon as possible following the submission of the EUA request by the company. This timeline allows for the FDA to thoroughly evaluate the data and information submitted in the EUA request before the meeting and to be prepared for a robust public discussion with the advisory committee members.
During the meeting, the committee will hear presentations from the company regarding the data for the antiviral drug. The FDA will also present its perspective regarding the sponsor’s data. There will be an open public hearing during which the public will be given an opportunity to provide comments.
The FDA intends to make background materials for the AMDAC meeting available to the public, including the meeting agenda and committee roster, no later than two business days before the meeting.
The FDA intends to live stream the AMDAC meeting on the agency’s YouTube page: the meeting will also be webcast from the FDA website.
FDA to Hold Advisory Committee Meeting to Discuss Merck and Ridgeback’s EUA Application for COVID-19 Oral Treatment
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is announcing an upcoming meeting of its Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC) to discuss Merck and Ridgeback’s request for an emergency use authorization (EUA) for molnupiravir, an investigational antiviral drug to treat COVID-19.
On Nov. 30, the advisory committee will meet to discuss the available data supporting the use of molnupiravir to treat mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults who have tested positive for COVID-19, and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death.
"The FDA is evaluating the safety and effectiveness data submitted by Merck and Ridgeback in their emergency use authorization request for molnupiravir, a new oral treatment for high-risk individuals with a newly diagnosed COVID-19 infection. We believe that, in this instance, a public discussion of these data with the agency’s advisory committee will help ensure clear understanding of the scientific data and information that the FDA is evaluating to make a decision about whether to authorize this treatment for emergency use,” said Patrizia Cavazzoni, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
At the FDA’s discretion, the agency may convene an advisory committee to solicit advice from independent outside experts on various complex scientific, technical, and policy issues. The FDA does not always convene an advisory committee meeting in connection with EUA reviews, but may do so under certain circumstances when discussion with the advisory committee will help inform agency decision making.
The meeting was scheduled as soon as possible following the submission of the EUA request by the company. This timeline allows for the FDA to thoroughly evaluate the data and information submitted in the EUA request before the meeting and to be prepared for a robust public discussion with the advisory committee members.
During the meeting, the committee will hear presentations from the company regarding the data for the antiviral drug. The FDA will also present its perspective regarding the sponsor’s data. There will be an open public hearing during which the public will be given an opportunity to provide comments.
The FDA intends to make background materials for the AMDAC meeting available to the public, including the meeting agenda and committee roster, no later than two business days before the meeting.
The FDA intends to live stream the AMDAC meeting on the agency’s YouTube page: the meeting will also be webcast from the FDA website.


Daniel Rizzo
Federal Whistleblower
Case Numbers:
HHS & SEC Whistleblower: HL-1412396
DOJ Investigation Report/ Whistleblower ID: 20250705-0001
NIH Case Reference: CS1137565
DOD Case #16282
IC IG / 50 U.S.C. §3033
ARPA-H (Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health)
Founder & CEO of FireGate Bioscience
USPTO: Inventor of the HIV Cure Protocol
https://investorshangout.com/images/MYImages/...G_2859.png
⸻
Public Links
FireGate Bioscience: https://www.firegatebioscience.com
NotYourDrug.com: https://www.notyourdrug.com
The underlying data is protected under federal law specifically 42 U.S.C. § 289b and its implementing regulation, 42 C.F.R. Part 93 through the Office of Research Integrity (askORI) within HHS, and coordinated with the Office of the Secretary / Office of Public Health and Science (OS/OPHS).
- Waiting…
whistleblower_complaints@wyden.senate.gov belongs to Senator Ron Wyden, a senior Democratic U.S. Senator from Oregon.
We are watching YOU……
“This isn’t conspiracy, this is criminal suppression.” - Ohm
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/us-attor...r-programs
https://investorshangout.com/images/MYImages/..._3015.jpeg
???? What Leronlimab Does
• Target: CCR5 receptor (the same receptor people with the CCR5Δ32 mutation lack — like the “Berlin” and “London” patients who were cured after stem cell transplants).
• Effect: By binding CCR5, leronlimab blocks HIV entry into CD4 cells.
• Trial Data:
• In combination therapy trials, ~81% of patients achieved viral loads <50 copies/mL (suppression, not cure).
• As monotherapy, some patients maintained suppression for long stretches (months), but not universally.
⸻
???? Why It Might Be Seen as a “Cure”
• In theory, if you completely block CCR5 on all relevant cells, HIV can’t infect new cells.
• If existing infected reservoirs naturally decay without replenishment, the virus could eventually vanish.
• That’s exactly what happened in the Berlin/London patients — except through stem cell transplants with CCR5Δ32 donors, not a drug.
⸻
???? Why It Hasn’t Been Called a Cure (Yet)
1. HIV Reservoirs Persist
Leronlimab blocks new infection, but it doesn’t flush latent virus from cells. Once treatment stops, those reservoirs can reignite infection.
2. CCR5-Independent Pathways
Some HIV strains use CXCR4 or dual-tropism (CCR5 + CXCR4). Leronlimab won’t stop those.
3. Clinical Conservatism
Researchers avoid using the word “cure” unless patients remain off all therapy with no viral rebound for years. Leronlimab hasn’t shown that in trials.
⸻
???? So Could It Alone Cure HIV?
• In select cases (if someone’s virus is purely CCR5-tropic and their reservoirs naturally decay): maybe.
• But in the general population, it’s unlikely as a monotherapy cure. More realistic is using it as part of a cure combo approach…
Federal Whistleblower
Case Numbers:
HHS & SEC Whistleblower: HL-1412396
DOJ Investigation Report/ Whistleblower ID: 20250705-0001
NIH Case Reference: CS1137565
DOD Case #16282
IC IG / 50 U.S.C. §3033
ARPA-H (Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health)
Founder & CEO of FireGate Bioscience
USPTO: Inventor of the HIV Cure Protocol

https://investorshangout.com/images/MYImages/...G_2859.png
⸻
Public Links
FireGate Bioscience: https://www.firegatebioscience.com
NotYourDrug.com: https://www.notyourdrug.com

The underlying data is protected under federal law specifically 42 U.S.C. § 289b and its implementing regulation, 42 C.F.R. Part 93 through the Office of Research Integrity (askORI) within HHS, and coordinated with the Office of the Secretary / Office of Public Health and Science (OS/OPHS).



whistleblower_complaints@wyden.senate.gov belongs to Senator Ron Wyden, a senior Democratic U.S. Senator from Oregon.
We are watching YOU……
“This isn’t conspiracy, this is criminal suppression.” - Ohm
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/us-attor...r-programs
https://investorshangout.com/images/MYImages/..._3015.jpeg
???? What Leronlimab Does
• Target: CCR5 receptor (the same receptor people with the CCR5Δ32 mutation lack — like the “Berlin” and “London” patients who were cured after stem cell transplants).
• Effect: By binding CCR5, leronlimab blocks HIV entry into CD4 cells.
• Trial Data:
• In combination therapy trials, ~81% of patients achieved viral loads <50 copies/mL (suppression, not cure).
• As monotherapy, some patients maintained suppression for long stretches (months), but not universally.
⸻
???? Why It Might Be Seen as a “Cure”
• In theory, if you completely block CCR5 on all relevant cells, HIV can’t infect new cells.
• If existing infected reservoirs naturally decay without replenishment, the virus could eventually vanish.
• That’s exactly what happened in the Berlin/London patients — except through stem cell transplants with CCR5Δ32 donors, not a drug.
⸻
???? Why It Hasn’t Been Called a Cure (Yet)
1. HIV Reservoirs Persist
Leronlimab blocks new infection, but it doesn’t flush latent virus from cells. Once treatment stops, those reservoirs can reignite infection.
2. CCR5-Independent Pathways
Some HIV strains use CXCR4 or dual-tropism (CCR5 + CXCR4). Leronlimab won’t stop those.
3. Clinical Conservatism
Researchers avoid using the word “cure” unless patients remain off all therapy with no viral rebound for years. Leronlimab hasn’t shown that in trials.
⸻
???? So Could It Alone Cure HIV?
• In select cases (if someone’s virus is purely CCR5-tropic and their reservoirs naturally decay): maybe.
• But in the general population, it’s unlikely as a monotherapy cure. More realistic is using it as part of a cure combo approach…