(Total Views: 486)
Posted On: 10/06/2021 8:50:35 PM
Post# of 148878
I hope and pray it is standardized, I have never done anything involving clinical trial data, so I can't say I have experience with it. But I have done numerous data extraction/loading projects and they never go smoothly.
Deciphering the procedures and functions used to load the data can be very time consuming and I would not be surprised if Amarex would say they are proprietary processes, if they don't get access to those processes it may be hard to validate the data.
If you can't show how things are calculated, how can you use it with the FDA. Just like the infamous unapproved test equipment. Let's not give the FDA an easy denial.
I am not trying to rain on any parade, I want to make us/and/or CYDY aware of this so that they may have enough information to ask for access to these processes from the start. I would be very disappointed if they had to go back to court a second time just to get access to the processes used.
I truly want NP to succeed, and I am tired of seeing every A-hole out there jumping through their asses to get in the way.
GLTA and soon.
Deciphering the procedures and functions used to load the data can be very time consuming and I would not be surprised if Amarex would say they are proprietary processes, if they don't get access to those processes it may be hard to validate the data.
If you can't show how things are calculated, how can you use it with the FDA. Just like the infamous unapproved test equipment. Let's not give the FDA an easy denial.
I am not trying to rain on any parade, I want to make us/and/or CYDY aware of this so that they may have enough information to ask for access to these processes from the start. I would be very disappointed if they had to go back to court a second time just to get access to the processes used.
I truly want NP to succeed, and I am tired of seeing every A-hole out there jumping through their asses to get in the way.
GLTA and soon.
(7)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼