(Total Views: 495)
Posted On: 10/05/2021 7:21:35 PM
Post# of 154991
Re: PatientLong #106738
Your statement 6 appears incorrect, as you have it BACKWARDS:
Paragraph 35 of the Complaint says, in part:
Thus, it looks like CytoDyn initiated an arbitration demand against Amarex, not the other way around.
PS, I have not really looked at your other points in detail, so not agreeing with them by omission of mention here.
Quote:
6. Amarex initiated arbitration to get CYDY to pay the money it has wittheld.
Paragraph 35 of the Complaint says, in part:
Quote:
In order to resolve that monetary dispute, pursuant to the MSA, CytoDyn has filed an arbitration demand against Amarex with the American Arbitration Association.
Thus, it looks like CytoDyn initiated an arbitration demand against Amarex, not the other way around.
PS, I have not really looked at your other points in detail, so not agreeing with them by omission of mention here.
(9)
(0)
