(Total Views: 543)
Posted On: 09/26/2021 3:04:49 AM
Post# of 153986
Thanks, Ohm.
Actually, last time you said it was 95 percent chance that CD12 would succeed. You didn't assume it would succeed; you just gave it a good chance. And if we hadn't had the skews of too-many-old-critical-patients in our arm and too-many-severe-rather-than-critical in the SOC arm, we would have hit our p-value. So you weren't wrong. We were either unlucky or screened badly.
Even without a given number for odds, we have to like your assessment.
Actually, last time you said it was 95 percent chance that CD12 would succeed. You didn't assume it would succeed; you just gave it a good chance. And if we hadn't had the skews of too-many-old-critical-patients in our arm and too-many-severe-rather-than-critical in the SOC arm, we would have hit our p-value. So you weren't wrong. We were either unlucky or screened badly.
Even without a given number for odds, we have to like your assessment.
(6)
(0)
