(Total Views: 471)
Posted On: 09/25/2021 11:46:33 AM
Post# of 148899
Re: KenChowder #105657
I would say it is kind of embarrassing to even consider such a 13d group. Have they not shown who they really are to everyone and their brother? The informed investor know who they are. Is there any doubt in their honesty? Definitely full of lies and smoke and mirrors in their path getting to this point. Can we trust their path forward. Are we sure they will do what they say they will do? Can we even believe anything they say? Do we typically follow dishonest leaders? I know… I do not follow someone who lies to me. The old sayin holds true for me… Fool me once and shame on you… Fool me twice and shame on me… They admitted their lies recently. Have we not all have been fooled at least once by their own admissions in their settlement of all the misinformation and outright lies they had to come clean on to settle the first lawsuit. Do you still trust this group? Why would you? What makes you trust a group that has lied to you? Do we forgive their lies? How do you forgive them? How do you trust them in the future?
Are they good leaders when they can’t decide proper priorities of which direction is needed for our company to be successful? When you can not figure out what direction to progress the company or which indications should be first… do we follow this 13d groups possible mismanagement? Will we really only have one trial indication at a time? How destructive would it be to stop all other trials and just focus on an arrogant doctors swan song trial only. When we have at minimal costs continuing all trials and potential revenue much sooner. Long haulers has its place and as soon as we can start the trial the better. But it is ignorance to stop our other trials. To wait until we get revenue from Long Haulers could bury us in dilution or maybe just bankrupt us. Is bankruptcy their true plan? It would be the smart as a fox way of intentionally going to bankruptcy. One where shareholders have no recourse. Then the liquidation sale they won’t speak too. Why won’t they address the claim? Can’t admit it now if this is their underlying plan or they do face shareholders recourse.
Having more irons in the fire is just good business and our management is doing everything right with the right priorities. Does the 13d group think that their path is sellable to the investors? They are not very convincing with a huge bet put on Long Haulers to be our first approval of any kind. Does this not mean we will stop all other trials that could achieve approval of some kind before Long haulers. Does this seem like an intelligent path?
Let’s compare our current management. Will they continue to be able to finance our trials until we receive our first approval? There is no doubt or very little risk. How soon could we see an approval on our managements path foreword? Maybe as son as 2-3 months. Will we continue all of our current trials? I believe that is our path and superior choice of direction forward. Has our current management told of us of our long term future? Yes they have. The 13d group has not committed to a long term future direction for our company. This is a serious flaw for them. Our current management has told us their long term plan is to grow our company into our own pharmaceutical company. Do not underestimate just how important this future is. There is not a better plan that we could have. The most return on our investment is growing into our own big pharmaceutical company and their is no argument about this. Becoming our own big Pharma is the best option we have to see the wealth of what our investment can do for us.
The 13d group gave us a 2 year plan with possible approval on Long Haulers. We all hope that Long Haulers is huge but do we bet our whole investment on it? We don’t know if they understand financing needed to continue our path forward to approval. The finance guy did not impress in his segment of the last call. Financing would be everything for them if we had to wait as long as two years for an approval on Long Haulers. They have not said definitively that they could receive a EUA for Long Haulers. Ohm says it’s not possible. Then can we wait almost two years for an approval?
Have I provided enough doubt about the 13d group to scare you? If your not scared now… you don’t have enough invested to become scared. Those of us that do are scared shitless of this unproven, lying, un-trustable inexperienced group. They have never ran a biotech company or a pharmaceutical company. They won’t tell you who the interim CEO will be? Why is that? It will cost them dearly in votes is why. My bet it is the less than believable Rosenbaum himself. If this isn’t a self destruction mode of a company to appoint a CEO of his unqualified experience. What a joke this would be. Ask yourself who else it would be? It’s not Patterson. He is the new CMO in their plan. Ask yourself why no CEO yet. Yep… more smoke and mirrors…more lies to come…
It’s just a rant that I have to speak to or it builds up inside of me and just flat pisses me off. Screw that 13d group and the horse they rode in on! Vote our current management and become rich for it.
There… is there any doubt in which way I lean?
Are they good leaders when they can’t decide proper priorities of which direction is needed for our company to be successful? When you can not figure out what direction to progress the company or which indications should be first… do we follow this 13d groups possible mismanagement? Will we really only have one trial indication at a time? How destructive would it be to stop all other trials and just focus on an arrogant doctors swan song trial only. When we have at minimal costs continuing all trials and potential revenue much sooner. Long haulers has its place and as soon as we can start the trial the better. But it is ignorance to stop our other trials. To wait until we get revenue from Long Haulers could bury us in dilution or maybe just bankrupt us. Is bankruptcy their true plan? It would be the smart as a fox way of intentionally going to bankruptcy. One where shareholders have no recourse. Then the liquidation sale they won’t speak too. Why won’t they address the claim? Can’t admit it now if this is their underlying plan or they do face shareholders recourse.
Having more irons in the fire is just good business and our management is doing everything right with the right priorities. Does the 13d group think that their path is sellable to the investors? They are not very convincing with a huge bet put on Long Haulers to be our first approval of any kind. Does this not mean we will stop all other trials that could achieve approval of some kind before Long haulers. Does this seem like an intelligent path?
Let’s compare our current management. Will they continue to be able to finance our trials until we receive our first approval? There is no doubt or very little risk. How soon could we see an approval on our managements path foreword? Maybe as son as 2-3 months. Will we continue all of our current trials? I believe that is our path and superior choice of direction forward. Has our current management told of us of our long term future? Yes they have. The 13d group has not committed to a long term future direction for our company. This is a serious flaw for them. Our current management has told us their long term plan is to grow our company into our own pharmaceutical company. Do not underestimate just how important this future is. There is not a better plan that we could have. The most return on our investment is growing into our own big pharmaceutical company and their is no argument about this. Becoming our own big Pharma is the best option we have to see the wealth of what our investment can do for us.
The 13d group gave us a 2 year plan with possible approval on Long Haulers. We all hope that Long Haulers is huge but do we bet our whole investment on it? We don’t know if they understand financing needed to continue our path forward to approval. The finance guy did not impress in his segment of the last call. Financing would be everything for them if we had to wait as long as two years for an approval on Long Haulers. They have not said definitively that they could receive a EUA for Long Haulers. Ohm says it’s not possible. Then can we wait almost two years for an approval?
Have I provided enough doubt about the 13d group to scare you? If your not scared now… you don’t have enough invested to become scared. Those of us that do are scared shitless of this unproven, lying, un-trustable inexperienced group. They have never ran a biotech company or a pharmaceutical company. They won’t tell you who the interim CEO will be? Why is that? It will cost them dearly in votes is why. My bet it is the less than believable Rosenbaum himself. If this isn’t a self destruction mode of a company to appoint a CEO of his unqualified experience. What a joke this would be. Ask yourself who else it would be? It’s not Patterson. He is the new CMO in their plan. Ask yourself why no CEO yet. Yep… more smoke and mirrors…more lies to come…
It’s just a rant that I have to speak to or it builds up inside of me and just flat pisses me off. Screw that 13d group and the horse they rode in on! Vote our current management and become rich for it.
There… is there any doubt in which way I lean?
(16)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
