Not here to call people names. Did I stereotype some of the posters here? Yes. I have no love for either extreme side. I have found it entertaining that long time posters like CDiddy have been called into question at times by new posters that come in and like a true witch hunt start claiming "soft basher", or heresay when someone wanted to at least hear the 13D out or sometimes even when someone calls out a questionable decision by NP. All of a sudden they should be "shunned" like a true cult experience from people who barely know the history of this company.

I like the board, like the info provided. but when people get too one sided and can't see the forest through the trees(both positive, and negative), I put them on ignore. You can see the turn where nothing mgmt does is right and they can't even find the positives of progress, or mgmt does no wrong and when mgmt messes up they completely ignore it like nothing happened because leronlimab will take us to the promise land despite the human decisions and execution necessary to make that happen.

Its possible I have offended some, but it might be for good. I used to be in the fluffy bunny unicorns boat...until I started to read the tea leaves more. When NP avoids a subject that means a delay. When someone stops showing up to CC or proactive videos who was a mainstay... they are out of the picture. Perhaps for good reason. Now I look for both sides on calls. What did NP avoid, but also what progress is being made and where.

This is easily my largest investment, and I need to be able to see both sides and the risks because I know it can be lucrative, but mgmt of the company is what is needed to get it there.