It's flawed because you made a crude and inapplicable analogy in the first place. I'm doing the best I can with the material given.. don't throw your ignorance all over that, too.

There's no argument; several immunocompromised hosts have been documented to have had infections, that have lasted weeks and months, that exhibit..
Sequential
Accumulation
of
Beneficial
Mutations

You can't debate this. The links are in the original response to your nonsense.

My argument is that an immunocompromised host is an incubator, moreso than a healthy host, for variants. Also, not revolutionary, novel, or controversial. To anyone who's literate on the matter.

HIV, is an immunodeficiency virus. It affects those with and without penii, and I wonder if you believe the vast majority South Africa is somehow homosexual? You have an issue because you are generally ignorant, and specifically embarrassed about having exposed yourself as such. Not my problem. Stop contributing to the spread of that ignorance, and stoo typing.

The BARRIER TO REPRODUCTION ****is**** a SELECTIVE PRESSURE. In a novel pathogen, it's going to initially be greater.

Because that's goats and this is a virus.. your shitty analogy, not mine.

Can't wait to see how you try to redeem your wounded ego next. It's getting more and more ridiculous.