(Total Views: 417)
Posted On: 08/23/2021 9:00:58 PM
Post# of 22465
Here what I will say good about Squires.
- whether or not India or QMC lives up to their agreement, it's structure was one of the best pro one sided contracts I personally have ever seen.
- while bulk Q Dots sale have shown not to be the pot of gold everyone thought credit must be given to Squires for adding blockchain to QTMM pipeline and merging it with Q Dots to produce an anti-counterfeiting product.
- Credit must also be given to Squires for thinking out side the core business and listening to associates in developing the QMC HealthID.
- IMHO if is only because of the QMC HealthID that QTMM has the relationship it has with Innova and Pasaca, making it a super success whether or not it is ever used as a Test verifier.
- credit must also be given to Squires in the handling of the L2 Capital fiasco. as bad as the share structure will be if Pasaca takes over 51% it would have been far worst dilution while adding no value to the company if he didn't oppose them.
The question that nobody seems to be asking is for the last 3 years what is the item or items that auditors are refusing to sign off on.
Auditing is not rocket science, it is a plug and chug process with the only things halting the process as I stated previously is illegal, unethical , unverifiable or simply incomplete data provided to them.
I think we can rule out illegal and unethical as the SEC has looked them over several times now and no chargers or allegations have been filed against them.
So what is it that can't be verified (revenue?) or simply incomplete (share structure?) that they do not want to or can not seem to fix?
- whether or not India or QMC lives up to their agreement, it's structure was one of the best pro one sided contracts I personally have ever seen.
- while bulk Q Dots sale have shown not to be the pot of gold everyone thought credit must be given to Squires for adding blockchain to QTMM pipeline and merging it with Q Dots to produce an anti-counterfeiting product.
- Credit must also be given to Squires for thinking out side the core business and listening to associates in developing the QMC HealthID.
- IMHO if is only because of the QMC HealthID that QTMM has the relationship it has with Innova and Pasaca, making it a super success whether or not it is ever used as a Test verifier.
- credit must also be given to Squires in the handling of the L2 Capital fiasco. as bad as the share structure will be if Pasaca takes over 51% it would have been far worst dilution while adding no value to the company if he didn't oppose them.
The question that nobody seems to be asking is for the last 3 years what is the item or items that auditors are refusing to sign off on.
Auditing is not rocket science, it is a plug and chug process with the only things halting the process as I stated previously is illegal, unethical , unverifiable or simply incomplete data provided to them.
I think we can rule out illegal and unethical as the SEC has looked them over several times now and no chargers or allegations have been filed against them.
So what is it that can't be verified (revenue?) or simply incomplete (share structure?) that they do not want to or can not seem to fix?
(0)
(0)
