I hear and appreciate what your saying but it does not have anything to do with the fact that it is true. Does it make a difference if it was put out by the "National Inquirer" if it states a fact and has validity? Please read the article you posted about Rumble and ask the question is it refuting Rumble or refuting the fact? I hope you will understand what I am saying as this has to do with finding the science and not berating a media source, as we all know many have their own agenda to follow.