(Total Views: 513)
Posted On: 08/07/2021 7:14:58 PM
Post# of 149637
Re: HHIGambler #99110
Quote:
seems that nader may have assumed that the patent belonged to him as patterson was under his employ, and i actually have to disagree with that, regardless of what a contract may say, this is too huge.
Whomever you're quoting seems to have no idea about contractual law.
(6)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
