(Total Views: 412)
Posted On: 08/06/2021 5:47:16 PM
Post# of 154090
Exactly, the first half of the FDA letter "we don't want you playing in our sandbox" and 2nd half "we need more info"
If the first half had said "we think you are on to something here", and 2nd half "we need more info" then okay, i get it, well sort of.
By May 2020 the FDA knew that leronlimab had had some success at Montefiore with critical and they knew it was safe from HIV trials. By July of 2020 the CYDY Yahoo board knew more about therapeutics and which ones might work than the FDA! Yet it was a full 8 months and 300,000 deaths later that we got this very defensive letter from the FDA.
The real question is why? What was really going on there? And the more info that comes out, the more sinister it appears.
If the first half had said "we think you are on to something here", and 2nd half "we need more info" then okay, i get it, well sort of.
By May 2020 the FDA knew that leronlimab had had some success at Montefiore with critical and they knew it was safe from HIV trials. By July of 2020 the CYDY Yahoo board knew more about therapeutics and which ones might work than the FDA! Yet it was a full 8 months and 300,000 deaths later that we got this very defensive letter from the FDA.
The real question is why? What was really going on there? And the more info that comes out, the more sinister it appears.
(7)
(0)
