(Total Views: 472)
Posted On: 08/05/2021 2:27:03 PM
Post# of 153543
The judgment on the shares withheld due to Pestell scamming the company was ruled in favor of Pestell was done by an arbiter so that should be final.
The judgement on his compensation due him as an employee was tossed because he argued he was an employee in Pennsylvania but actually resided in a different state Florida. Therefore he could not file under Pennsylvania law.
The judgement on his compensation due him as an employee was tossed because he argued he was an employee in Pennsylvania but actually resided in a different state Florida. Therefore he could not file under Pennsylvania law.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
