Quote:

---

DOJ INVESTIGATION:

As one poster points out nothing has been announced as a material event and the 10K goes through May only. We would have heard something by now unless it's a nothing burger.

Here is my two cents:

1) The 10K never says Cytodyn or it's board members are "UNDER" investigation. Only that they received subpoenas for information related to Leronlimab and conversations with the FDA and others

That's huge because of point two below.

2) The DOJ does not subpoena information from suspected criminals. "Hello, suspected criminals, would you be kind enough to hand over your incriminating evidence untampered so we can prosecute you?"

The DOJ notifies a suspected criminal last. Not first!!! Guess who gets contacted first in a DOJ investigation? Witnesses! (Look at the brain on Brad!)

3) Posters have pointed out the DOJ does not need subpoenas for public comments made. Well, they don't need to go to Cytodyn for private comments made to FDA, either!!! Guess who they can get those from? Right, the FDA!! "Hello, FDA, please cooperate in our Cytodyn investigation by handing over conversations with them, thanks"

But no, they didn't go to FDA, they asked for conversations directly from Cytodyn.

4) If Cytodyn had material information needed to prosecute Cytodyn, a warrant resulting in doors busted open and computers and all other correspondence seized to preserve evidence would have occurred.

That didn't happen so don't let the bashers make you think NP now has the DOJ on him.

5) That brings us to suspects. If the DOJ isn't looking into Cytodyn, then who? I found it pretty laughable the bashers immediately suspected Cytodyn when there is a whole laundry list of suspects.

THE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS:

1) Citron short attack:.

We all know what happened June of 2020. That was blatant stock manipulation. Possibly DOJ is finally getting around to it. One basher pointed out it's unlikely as that was fourteen months ago.

Uh, no. First, the 10K is up through May so that's 8-11 months after the attack.

Secondly, just because you first heard about it now doesn't mean DOJ hasn't been secretly investigating all this time. They wouldn't contact Cytodyn with subpoenas at the very beginning of the investigation.

And finally, DOJ is slow and this is probably a small fish to fry all things considered. Still the Citron attack was a multi-million dollar crime if prosecuted.

2) bogus lawsuit firms:

The mass advertising attack was destructive to the stock price. What would Cytodyn conversations have to do with fake lawsuits? Well, if you are going to prove they are fake, you need the actual conversations with FDA as well as investors that show it was the lawsuits themselves depressing the stock.

Why need a subpoena for something that would help Cytodyn? That's probably to cover Cytodyn in case private information is handed over to authorities. Cytodyn needs to show they were subpoena'd. They have enough lawsuits as it is.

3) Bruce Patterson:

Yes, this has to be considered.

Bruce actually caused a spike in stock price by mentioning there were discussions ongoing with OWS. Remember that?

Then BP refused to hand over assays which were needed for FDA submission and stock plummeted.

BP owns stock. Even if he didn't, he could have told people he knows what influential moves he was planning on doing.

We still don't know what BP/NP split was about but if NP suspected these types of shenanigans that would be a good reason to sever the relationship and also keep mum(as they are heavy charges to make without definitive proof)

BP is a respected physician but start connecting the dots is all I am saying!

4) FDA

At first it may sound far fetched but remember point two above. DOJ contacts the suspect last for info. They asked for conversations between Cytodyn and FDA from Cytodyn, not the FDA!

Has the FDA done anything recently that might trigger suspicion? Approving drugs that cause board members to resign in protest? Approving drugs with serious side effects that seem not to work for multi-million dollar conglomerates? Causing an investigation by the head of the FDA?

All of the above could have gotten a DOJ investigation for possible corruption, bribery, kickbacks and, yeah, now that's a pretty damn big fish to fry for the DOJ.

But what does that have to do with Cytodyn? IDK, has there been any FDA notice released that seemed unusual, that seemed mysteriously misleading as to Leronlimab efficacy and safety and endpoints met(while other similar drugs were approved)? A letter that was posted just days before a multi-million dollar deal was to be announced with the Philippines? And which probably scuttled that along with causing a drop in stock price?

Who at the FDA wrote that letter and why? We're there any bribes, kickbacks, corruption?

If it is the FDA under investigation, you go to Cytodyn for the conversations showing FDA was Gung Ho privately. Not the FDA!

---