(Total Views: 501)
Posted On: 07/20/2021 9:21:49 AM
Post# of 153986
22 out of 29 patients is 75, nearly 76%. There would be no reason to use 72% if the actual number was .758.
The only number in that area I get that is actually 72% is 18 out of 25. Maybe 5 patients have dropped out or not been in the program for the full 12 months yet. (I know, the results were supposed to wait for everyone to be in the program for 12 months.)
But if it were 25 patients, with 18 showing a decrease in CAMLs, then the 450% overall survival improvement would mean that w/o Leron only 4 of the 25 would be alive in 12 months, but now those 18 are -- 450% improvement (4 vs. 18).
Maybe.
The only number in that area I get that is actually 72% is 18 out of 25. Maybe 5 patients have dropped out or not been in the program for the full 12 months yet. (I know, the results were supposed to wait for everyone to be in the program for 12 months.)
But if it were 25 patients, with 18 showing a decrease in CAMLs, then the 450% overall survival improvement would mean that w/o Leron only 4 of the 25 would be alive in 12 months, but now those 18 are -- 450% improvement (4 vs. 18).
Maybe.
(6)
(0)
