(Total Views: 567)
Posted On: 07/01/2021 9:25:13 AM
Post# of 9124
Micro,
I’m perplexed with your SEC investigation comments train. The Nanologix news release last autumn stated the investigation had closed after a number of months after they sought the assistance of the US congressman for their area. It appears Nanologix satisfied the SEC’s interest, which may have been caused by either a bogus whistleblower accusation, as implied by simultaneous FDA and FINRA queries, or simply by the SEC going after any small company making a statement about CoVid19 developments. Why are you stating it’s ongoing and taking resources when Nanologix itself made a public statement that it was closed? This is extremely important as your posts are viewed by many here as definitive regarding such matters and unless you have clear information otherwise I have to question why you are regarding what’s been stated as closed as not.
Scott
I’m perplexed with your SEC investigation comments train. The Nanologix news release last autumn stated the investigation had closed after a number of months after they sought the assistance of the US congressman for their area. It appears Nanologix satisfied the SEC’s interest, which may have been caused by either a bogus whistleblower accusation, as implied by simultaneous FDA and FINRA queries, or simply by the SEC going after any small company making a statement about CoVid19 developments. Why are you stating it’s ongoing and taking resources when Nanologix itself made a public statement that it was closed? This is extremely important as your posts are viewed by many here as definitive regarding such matters and unless you have clear information otherwise I have to question why you are regarding what’s been stated as closed as not.
Scott
(6)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
