Certainly that is a possibility, but a technical and theoretical possibility is a far reach from stating "Whether or not QMC remains public." To casually in a offhand remark make a reference like that that goes way beyond where we are at this point. Sure, we can trade in worst case scenarios, but why go there when by all indications this is a procedural matter that is well within the scope of our ability to address and steps are being taken to handle. It raises an issue that is misleading. Why do it?