Hey blafarm.. I read your post and cannot argue with any of it. That being said, it kind of felt like all of your conclusions were leading to one big, over-arching statement that you never actually made (which is understandable given how some on this board would react in a knee-jerk fashion, some with childish words).

In the end, your conclusion appears to be that Nader has to go because the damage he has created is a hole with the FDA that he/CYDY does not seem capable of climbing out of. I would agree that if CYDY botches the severe/critical trials in Brazil, it's "game over" for him. The BLA for HIV? I may sooner get a 7 card straight flush in Vegas at the pai gow tables.

If I have misunderstood what your conclusion appears to be, please let me know...but in this case, it seems pretty damn clear that CYDY is in quicksand and ain't nobody offering a helping hand.