Thanks for sharing. That’s a nice article. It figures that it’s from a source outside of the US, where everyone is too busy playing the “LL is Lava” game and dancing around it like Baryshnikov to care.

The other thing I noted was the comment about “if interim analysis looks good” (rough translation from memory) then they could see approval. I’d bet we are still waiting to have enough good looking data to show for an approval any time soon. Would love to be wrong!