(Total Views: 763)
Posted On: 04/30/2021 11:57:01 AM
Post# of 148984
Re: enemyofpluto #88649
This Synthesis 1: Capital paper raises some important questions as to its validity. First, there is no author cited and there are no sources for contact for the intended audience, which is also not revealed. Without citation it comes off as possibly an inter-office memo between investors ... but which investors?
An excellent and very detailed analysis, but the numerous misspellings, grammatical errors, etc. that should have been caught prior to release of such an exhaustive document hacks away at its credibility and authenticity.
Is this an exercise in wishful thinking created by an individual investor trying to make waves or is it a legitimate investment analysis aimed at institutional investors or even a BP buyout contender?
An excellent and very detailed analysis, but the numerous misspellings, grammatical errors, etc. that should have been caught prior to release of such an exhaustive document hacks away at its credibility and authenticity.
Is this an exercise in wishful thinking created by an individual investor trying to make waves or is it a legitimate investment analysis aimed at institutional investors or even a BP buyout contender?
(2)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼