I find it interesting that you refer to earlier products and services touted by the company as "garbage." I assume you did not think the same of them when they each were announced, so when did they turn foul? I look at every one of those items I mentioned earlier (with the exception of Creek Mountain - and that was a very costly set of events/circumstances for us shareholders, by the way), and they all look (and looked) like promising ideas. No one has ever explained why one day they are promising, and the next day they are, as you call them, garbage.