(Total Views: 490)
Posted On: 04/25/2021 2:36:36 PM
Post# of 148899
i guess maybe the second $25 million investor could have been motivated by the overall story and maybe that second investor is a new investor.
If the most recent $25 million investor is new, maybe he/she just doesn't care what CYCY does with the money. They just want in.
But if the second $25 million was the same investor as before, then they are doing a very starge risk-reward calculation.
The inventory is already huge. The reward is already well know.
The risk has already accrued on Fife/Streeterville's previous investments.
They already have $75 million at risk.
The potential reward on that is potentiall 5x or more.
If I already have $75 million at risk, the inventory reward is already accrued, why would I take additional risk in the form of making more inventory? Making more inventory does zero to reduce risk.
If the most recent $25 million investor is new, maybe he/she just doesn't care what CYCY does with the money. They just want in.
But if the second $25 million was the same investor as before, then they are doing a very starge risk-reward calculation.
The inventory is already huge. The reward is already well know.
The risk has already accrued on Fife/Streeterville's previous investments.
They already have $75 million at risk.
The potential reward on that is potentiall 5x or more.
If I already have $75 million at risk, the inventory reward is already accrued, why would I take additional risk in the form of making more inventory? Making more inventory does zero to reduce risk.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
