A speculative comment deliberatly designed as an attempt to manipulate shareholder sentiment with the intention to try to get shareholders to sell and bankrupt the company. Institutional naked short positions don't have to pay the loaned shares back if the company is forced into bankruptcy do they ?

Nothing has been decided or presented, so how can this comment even be realivent ? No one knows anything...... it was posted just to create doubt.

I wonder if one should save posts like this and send them to the lawyer for the defense to demonstrate attempts at deliberate stock manipulation and the kind of attacks this company and it's shareholders have had to endure and defend against to stave off bankruptcy JMHO

Food for thought ...so many posts like that to present

GLTA