(Total Views: 493)
Posted On: 04/08/2021 9:05:53 AM
Post# of 149265
Re: ClosetInvestor #85793
i agree that Patterson is a total stud, and commands tremendous respect. but i don't see any scenario where he comes back for reasons that have been stated.
the core issue (in addition to replacing Rahman, and fast) is NP as a face man and lead communicator. He's just not good at it. On the CC, When he went through the 3 options we now have to proceed with our COVID trials, i was utterly confused. to be fair, i'm no scientist or doctor, but it was just a rambling explanation that was "clear as mud". and it concerned the core activity of the company right now.
so, i guess i'm saying that it doesn't necessarily have to be Patterson (i think that ship has sailed) but it just can't be NP as our face-man - at least if we want to put our best foot forward. Maybe Recknor? Kelly? Both very impressive, both MDs.
just my thoughts
the core issue (in addition to replacing Rahman, and fast) is NP as a face man and lead communicator. He's just not good at it. On the CC, When he went through the 3 options we now have to proceed with our COVID trials, i was utterly confused. to be fair, i'm no scientist or doctor, but it was just a rambling explanation that was "clear as mud". and it concerned the core activity of the company right now.
so, i guess i'm saying that it doesn't necessarily have to be Patterson (i think that ship has sailed) but it just can't be NP as our face-man - at least if we want to put our best foot forward. Maybe Recknor? Kelly? Both very impressive, both MDs.
just my thoughts
(5)
(1)
Scroll down for more posts ▼