Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
CytoDyn Inc CYDY
(Total Views: 477)
Posted On: 03/31/2021 1:08:53 PM
Post# of 153986
Posted By: MD VIROLOGIST
I wanted to clarify something Dr. Patterson is writing the prescriptions.
Am I wrong wasn’t the choice of the members of the DSMB made by the company?

Can dosing and route of administration be considered a violation of trial design.

If increased doses are proposed for a change in trial design, could the FDA, ask to repeat phase1/2 to determine safety at the higher dosing?

I think a change in the route of administration, which probably would have been granted . Moreover Dr. Patterson’s paper showed onset of action was around 3 days (probably due to poor absorption in critical patients) a lot of time for the study group to have advanced disease. IV would have immediate action.

I have used the example of insulin in the ICU. Translating the out patients HIV experience to the ICU perhaps was not a good idea in trial design. Maybe to keep the mantra that there is an advantage in not having to start an IV??. The average patient in the unit may have 6-8 IV’s in already. I think if an intensivist was involved CD-12 would be different and perhaps be more successful.













(4)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site